Use 'frgm' instead of 'tile' in webpmux parameters

- Also, use the term 'fragments' instead of 'tiling' in code
- This makes code consistent with the spec.

Change-Id: Ibeccffc35db23bbedb88cc5e18e29e51621931f8
This commit is contained in:
Urvang Joshi
2012-10-31 17:49:15 -07:00
parent 81b8a741ed
commit a00a3daf5b
11 changed files with 219 additions and 212 deletions

View File

@ -21,9 +21,9 @@ webpmux \- command line tool to create WebP Mux/container file.
.B \-o
.I OUTPUT
.br
.B webpmux \-tile
.I TILE_OPTIONS
.B [\-tile...] \-o
.B webpmux \-frgm
.I FRAGMENT_OPTIONS
.B [\-frgm...] \-o
.I OUTPUT
.br
.B webpmux \-frame
@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ Get EXIF metadata.
.B xmp
Get XMP metadata.
.TP
.B tile n
Get nth tile.
.B frgm n
Get nth fragment.
.TP
.B frame n
Get nth frame.
@ -90,11 +90,11 @@ Strip EXIF metadata.
.B xmp
Strip XMP metadata.
.SS TILE_OPTIONS (\-tile)
.SS FRAGMENT_OPTIONS (\-frgm)
.TP
.B file_i +xi+yi
Where: 'file_i' is the i'th tile (WebP format) and 'xi','yi' specify the image
offset for this tile.
Where: 'file_i' is the i'th fragment (WebP format) and 'xi','yi' specify the
image offset for this fragment.
.SS FRAME_OPTIONS (\-frame)
.TP