cosmetics: fix some typos

Change-Id: I0d6efebd817815139db5ae87236fd8911df4d53c
This commit is contained in:
James Zern
2013-11-26 19:21:14 -08:00
parent cb261f790f
commit 4931c3294b
13 changed files with 15 additions and 15 deletions

View File

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
#define MID_ALPHA 64 // neutral value for susceptibility
#define MIN_ALPHA 30 // lowest usable value for susceptibility
#define MAX_ALPHA 100 // higher meaninful value for susceptibility
#define MAX_ALPHA 100 // higher meaningful value for susceptibility
#define SNS_TO_DQ 0.9 // Scaling constant between the sns value and the QP
// power-law modulation. Must be strictly less than 1.
@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static double QualityToCompression(double c) {
// exponent is somewhere between 2.8 and 3.2, but we're mostly interested
// in the mid-quant range. So we scale the compressibility inversely to
// this power-law: quant ~= compression ^ 1/3. This law holds well for
// low quant. Finer modelling for high-quant would make use of kAcTable[]
// low quant. Finer modeling for high-quant would make use of kAcTable[]
// more explicitly.
const double v = pow(linear_c, 1 / 3.);
return v;
@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ static int ReconstructUV(VP8EncIterator* const it, VP8ModeScore* const rd,
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
// RD-opt decision. Reconstruct each modes, evalue distortion and bit-cost.
// Pick the mode is lower RD-cost = Rate + lamba * Distortion.
// Pick the mode is lower RD-cost = Rate + lambda * Distortion.
static void StoreMaxDelta(VP8SegmentInfo* const dqm, const int16_t DCs[16]) {
// We look at the first three AC coefficients to determine what is the average